Letters: Measure A supporters don't appreciate economic impact

I have been following all the letters, articles, and editorials in The Triplicate about Measure A, and it never ceases to amaze me at how insulated public officials have become from the communities in which they serve.

It was a nice surprise to read Mr. Parker's take on what Measure A will mean to the community and a more accurate assessment of the state of our schools. Still, I find it odd that there has been no mention of the multi-million-dollar upgrades and improvements at most of the district's schools and the expensive new buildings on Harding all added to the district in the last 10 years. I do not recall it requiring a local bond measure for that new construction.

Supporters of Measure A seem to have no idea the extent of the burden $25 million plus interest will have on the local economy. We receive assurances that the money will be spent locally and have competent oversight. None of these promises can the district guarantee. Interest on the bonds will no doubt leave the county, required open bidding does not guarantee local jobs, materials will come from outside, and oversight is only as good as the folks that serve.

While I doubt there will be much embarrassment from the measure's supporters over the nature of the list of improvements and new construction, there should be. The list is simply that, a wish list. I would hope, at least, they understand that this does not set a very good example to the community at large when the paid public officials at the district do not have the foresight to keep their own house in order. They do; however, clearly know that this is not a particularly auspicious time to be taking on any new debt, yet do not seem to be able to exercise any fiscal restraint whatsoever.

Most people understand that this is a time for necessities, not wishes.

Samuel Strait

Crescent City