>Crescent City California News, Sports, & Weather | The Triplicate

News Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google
Updated 11:31pm - Mar 18, 2010

Home arrow Opinion arrow Our View: Shrinking justice in fraud case

Our View: Shrinking justice in fraud case

How does an insurance fraud scandal that authorities said involved more than 60 victims and 80 felony charges end up with one defendant sentenced to 30 days’ house arrest for a single misdemeanor and another getting 280 hours of community service?

After all, no one denies that some customers of Jerrold Young’s Crescent City insurance company paid for insurance they never got.

Young, who initially faced 28 felony charges, has maintained his innocence since his arrest in 2007. He said to the extent wrongdoing occurred, it was perpetrated by one of his employees without his knowledge.

Judge John Morrison disagreed when he sentenced Young to 30 days in jail earlier this month, saying, “As the head of that agency, it’s your responsibility.”

And yet, there was Morrison philosophizing from the Del Norte Superior Court bench less than 10 days later, saying he had reconsidered. Thirty days was too harsh, the judge said, especially since the jail time could result in Young losing his job as a prison correctional officer.

Instead, Morrison said he had decided on 120 days of community service. Even as he spoke, the judge further reconsidered the punishment and reduced it to 280 hours, suggesting Young could spend them coaching youth sports.

The softening of the sentence angered Del Norte County District Attorney Mike Riese, who said, “That’s not proper to feel sorry for the defendant because he’s a correctional officer; peace officers should be held to a higher standard.”

And yet, there was Riese months earlier reducing dozens of felony charges to two misdemeanors. One resulted in 30 days of house arrest and the payment of $5,000 in restitution by Young’s former employee, Page Castro, for grand theft by embezzlement. For the other, Young agreed to plead no contest on behalf of his business for being an accessory after the fact, setting the stage for this month’s courtroom anti-climax.

“It’s a plea bargain,” Riese said almost a year ago. “I have to look at the cost of prosecution, the likelihood of a conviction and what is the goal. The goal is to protect the consumer.”

Of course one could argue that the ultimate goal of the county’s lead prosecutor should be justice, and all that implies, including appropriate punishment. But eye-popping plea bargains happen everywhere in the country, and in tiny Del Norte, Riese must daily address the reality of what the court system can handle. In this case, an actual trial would have taken months and included more than 100 witnesses, he said.

One could also argue that Young has suffered plenty. He’s paid $200,000 out of pocket, said his attorney. It’s known that Young has settled at least one lawsuit brought by a customer, has paid more than $14,000 in restitution and was fined $17,000 by the California Department of Insurance, which also has placed restrictions on his company’s license.

Maybe that’s as good as it gets when it comes to investigating accusations of white-collar crime in Del Norte County. Make a high-profile arrest, file the charges and ultimately plea-bargain to avoid a costly and complicated trial.

You be the judge.

 

Triplicate front page

Get home delivery of the Triplicate for only $7.94 a month. After filling out one simple and secure online form you could be on your way to learning more about your city, state and world than you ever have before.
subscribe
The Daily Triplicate:

312 H Street
P.O. Box 277
Crescent City, CA 95531

(707) 464-2141
webmaster@triplicate.com

Follow The Triplicate headlines on Follow The Triplicate headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2010 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use

Triplicate.com works best with the latest versions of Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Internet Explorer or Apple Safari