>Crescent City California News, Sports, & Weather | The Triplicate

News Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google
Updated 2:34pm - Jul 29, 2016

Home arrow Opinion arrow Letters arrow Letters to the Editor April 21, 2011


Letters to the Editor April 21, 2011

A fenced dog park in Del Norte County would be great to have

We need a fenced dog park in our area where non-aggressive dogs and their owners can walk and play. I had the opportunity to go to the dog park in Medford, Ore., this past week with my Irish setter, Sean.

The dog park is a large area with a designated walking path around the perimeter, plenty of room for the owners to play fetch with their dogs, dogs to chase  each other and owners to socialize with others. Never did I see an out-of-control owner or dog. What I did see were dogs running, owners walking and talking and on those occasions when the dogs relieved themselves, the owners were quick to clean up after their dogs.

I can just hear someone say, it is too expensive, or some other excuse. We as a community only have to look to our neighbor to the north of us to see a wonderful example of community spirit. I read in The Curry Coastal Pilot about a Boy Scout who took up the challenge of getting a dog park established and with the cooperation of the Oregon State Parks Department and the help of friends and local businesses, created a simple, yet successful, dog park in Harbor.

We as a community should follow this Boy Scout’s example. Nothing is impossible, especially with our community filled with great, talented people who together can and should take on this challenge! After all, we are the best city in America!

Come on Del Norte County, together lets create the best, friendliest social meeting place for dogs and dog owners in Northern California! Are you ready? Lets get started!

Kay Edwards

Crescent City

It’s vital for young people to have access to needed medical care


I applaud the School Board members who voted in favor of the new teen clinic. They face the opposition of some in the community. Ultimately, they looked at the interests of the students first, and this is as it should be.

Calie Martin (“Why was clinic approved?” Coastal Voices, April 19) feels this is giving students a license to lie to their parents. As a former high school teacher, she must know that teen behavior is not always under the control of parents, and that often parents are absent or abusive.

It’s most important that the young people in the community have access to the medical care they need, and to provide that, the clinic must keep records confidential, even from the parents.

Barry Wendell

Crescent City

Confronting teens about sex is not beneficial for their health


The Teen Health Clinic has stirred up a wasp nest of controversy and misinformation. In response to John Mertes April 14 letter (“Ignorance of sexual health has number of consequences”),I believe he doesn’t fully understand the motivations of many of those who oppose the Teen Health Clinic.

This is not simply an abortion issue. The Teen Health Clinic is not really about education. The information the clinic provides is already required to be taught at the high school unless a student’s parent desires to have the student excused from that part of the education.

What has many people concerned about the Teen Health Center is that the district is not focused on education. For many teens, confronting them with the issue of sex is not beneficial for their health, emotional and physical well being, and could have serious negative implications to their academic potential and future. This in turn affects the health of the community as a whole.

We need educated and trained graduates coming out into our job market. We need future leaders, mechanics, bakers, medical workers. It’s the responsibility of the parents, teachers and the administrators to ensure this happens.

Del Norte County ranks below average in the state for academic achievement and above the average for the number of high school dropouts. It seems that the district’s efforts would be better focused on fixing these problems rather than focusing on enabling children from the age of 12 up to access condoms and birth control between and during classes at school.

Access to the clinic’s services on district property makes this a parent issue as well. The district has forsaken its duty to educate in these matters and has referred it out to another organization. Is this how we expect our school system to educate? Speaking for myself, I would not send my child to school suspecting that they were receiving their education elsewhere, without my knowledge or consent, without the opportunity to review the curriculum, or the ability to hold the staff accountable for the lessons that they are teaching.

I invite the school district’s response to their methods of education and how this action will unite students, parents, administrators and the community.

Jeff Stice

Crescent City


Del Norte Triplicate:

312 H Street
P.O. Box 277
Crescent City, CA 95531

(707) 464-2141

Follow The Triplicate headlines on Follow The Triplicate headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2016 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use