I am commenting in regard to Triplicate Editor Richard Wiens' Feb. 3 column titled "Remember when news was news?"

A person can indeed find an abundance of information at their fingertips with the advent of the Internet age. Apparently newspapers are reluctant to change and adapt to meet the demands of this new age. The Internet has been an undeniable medium for the exchange of ideas for nearly two decades now.

Perhaps that is why newspapers are failing across the country. They are

plagued by the fact that a person can receive 90 percent of their

content with the free click of a button. For example, Wednesday's

Triplicate last week contained 20 news stories. Only five of them (25

percent) were local stories that could not be found anywhere else,

while 75 percent of them were Associated Press stories that could be

found from multiple sources online.

The only reason I and many others read the Triplicate is for local

news and opinion. I find that I can get far more detailed and useful

regional news from online sources. Throughout history industries have

had to adapt with the advance of technology. The Internet and

information age has provided a venue for anyone to exercise their right

of free speech. A simple Google search can provide me with a multitude

of news reports, expert opinions, and layperson "blogging" on any event

or subject in the world.

Fundamental economics tells us that an increase in the supply of a

service with unchanged demand will lower the price of that service.

News sources unable to adapt to the changing market conditions will not

survive. This is nothing to fear, unless you are one of the unfortunate

who do not adapt. These changes also provide entrepreneurial


I fear the potential answer to Mr. Wiens' original question, "Where

is America headed when it comes to getting its news?" I read recently

that Dan Rather is pleading with the White House for government

intervention in the media. Another bailout I suppose. That's the new

trend. If an industry cannot adapt to changes in market conditions,

they just plead with the government for a bailout and stick their loses

to the citizens.

What happens when the government is the only source for news? This

would take us back to a time when everyone gets their news from the

same source. Though I doubt very many would be happy to see that

happen. Thank goodness we now live in an age where anyone can have an

audience instead of the "grand old days" when only a few could. In

those days, the only hope you had of getting your opinion heard was to

get a letter to the editor printed. The only other choice would be to

print and distribute your own media.

This letter probably won't even be printed because it is over 400

words. At least now I have the choice to freely distribute it online. I

currently do not subscribe to The Triplicate because it is available

online and I can wait 24 hours for the local content that interests me.

I would gladly pay for a subscription (or membership) if it were to be

available online and had 75 percent local content and 25 percent

Associated Press, instead of the reverse.

Ryan Young is a Fort Dick resident.