Our View: Here we go again

Triplicate Staff

There's a new effort afoot to get rid of the Del Norte Solid Waste Management Authority, and there are a couple of important points to consider at the outset.

The first is that at least two county supervisors, Mike Sullivan and Gerry Hemmingsen, are clearly determined to dissolve the authority if they can. After all, they appointed an ad hoc committee in 2009 to study the possibility of doing just that. But the committee completed its work without recommending dissolution, so now Sullivan and Hemmingsen are looking to form a new ad hoc committee in hopes of a different result.

Sullivan was being disingenuous when he said this week: "The first ad hoc was to evaluate the authority and this second one will be to make some changes."

The fact is, both Hemmingsen and Sullivan clearly stated in 2009 that

they wanted the first ad hoc committee to consider dissolving the

authority.

Said Sullivan at the time: "We're really going to have to go through

the numbers, and if there's a potential cost savings without a lapse in

service then we'll have to consider it (dissolution)."

Said Hemmingsen at the time: "Can the community be better served by

not having the cost of this bureaucracy? Or, is it a necessary thing?"

So let's not pretend that the first ad hoc committee wasn't formed to

consider dissolution. The majority of its members simply didn't reach

the conclusion that the two supervisors wanted, and now they hope a new

committee will be more agreeable.

The second issue to consider at the outset is the question of

stipends paid to Solid Waste Authority Board members: $375 a month if

they attend a meeting, $300 a month even if they don't. The Authority

Board includes appointed members from the Board of Supervisors and the

City Council. When Sullivan served on it, he suggested the stipends be

reduced to $75 a month, but no one ever seconded his motion.

Sullivan is no longer on the Authority Board, but when the authority

wrote a formal reply to the report of the first ad hoc committee, it

noted Sullivan had never turned down his authority stipends, totaling

$9,000.

We find the implication that Sullivan was hypocritical for taking

stipends he spoke out against to be poppycock. He says he donated the

money to charity. Regardless, a public official trying to save the

public some money shouldn't be expected to turn down his portion of that

money if he's unsuccessful in his efforts to change the rules.

So two supervisors are dead-set on dissolving the authority, which in

turn is critical of one of those supervisors for taking his portion of

stipends that he opposed in principle. Those are the givens. We'd be

well-served to get beyond them and focus on the big picture.

The authority currently oversees solid waste issues in the county. It

oversees a private company (Recology Del Norte) that provides garbage

and recycling pickup services. It oversees another private company

(Hambro) that operates the transfer station and the hauling of the

county's garbage to an Oregon landfill. And it monitors a closed

Crescent City landfill that still has environmental issues that the

state wants addressed.

Could these responsibilities be handled more effectively and

efficiently without the authority? If we're going to again ponder that

question, we need to set aside personality conflicts and just deal with

the facts.

Of course, you could argue that the first ad hoc committee already

did that.

- The Daily Triplicate

14006881
The Del Norte Triplicate
This image is copyrighted.

Crescent City autos, jobs, real estate and merchandise.

Ads appear Online and in Print

View Classifieds

Connect with The Del Norte Triplicate


Triplicate Newsstand

Tuesday August 30, 2016

Read digital interactive editions of our publications

Read Today's Edition Take A Tour
View All Publications