Crescent City Mayor Blake Inscore expressed the shared frustration of the collective City Council when it felt required to vote Monday night for another delay in the Pebble Beach Drive Bank Stabilization Project.

“I don’t like the process, I don’t like the risk it puts upon us,” Inscore said. “This project has already almost tripled in cost since it was introduced.

“The idea of trying to put the hopes of this project on something that’s going to happen at the legislative level in Congress, in this state, I think we might as well say this will never get built.”

The stabilization project has been in the planning stage since more than 6 inches of rain fell Dec. 14, 2016, causing significant erosion on Pebble Beach Drive, from Preston Island to Sixth Street.

The delay for the $3.8-million preliminary engineering portion of the project stemmed from California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) requirements that the city receive more than the lone proposal that had been submitted.

“Unfortunately, due to nature of that response, CalTrans has requested that we reject all proposals and go out for qualifications again,” Public Works Director Jon Olson told the City Council. “Go through RFQ process and hopefully get more than one proposal next time around.”

Meanwhile, said Olsen, time is not on the city’s side. Disaster relief funds from the Federal Highway Administration come with a use-by date.

“We have to be out for construction by October/November,” said City Manager Eric Wier. “Two months, basically. So we’re not going to make that.

“That’s the hard part with these relief funds,” he said, “they only do that two years from the disaster to when you have to be under construction. That’s environmental, that’s design, that’s everything.

“They’ve limited the number of time extensions that are approved. Out of 50 time extensions last year, they granted one or two.”

One pathway CalTrans gave the city was through what it called a geotechnical investigation. Wier said the city went that route, but that was delayed significantly because of the city’s inability to get FAA approval to fly a drone above the site.

“This is a very complicated project that requires lots of consultants of different types and a lot of specialty studies,” Olsen said. “The only study finished to date was the geotechnical study, a brief one, a preliminary study with the Del Norte Local Coastal Commission. We’re going to need a more robust consultant and robust report.”

Olsen said the city plans to apply for a time extension before the end of August, but won’t know if the extension is granted until some point in November. “If we were to spend a bunch of money (and) then don’t get the extension, those monies would not be reimbursed,” he said.

So the plan now is to go through the request-for-qualifications process one more time, award a contract, then delay any work until city officials know an extension has been granted.

Further complicating the process is the question of whether the federal funds will still be available. “Since money for this particular federal project was not spent, monies were reallocated. It’s really at the congressional level.

“Even if we get the extension, we don’t know if there will be money available for the project,” Olsen said.

So the City Council voted unanimously to reject the one bid and return to the request-for-qualifications process.


Online Poll

Will you observe Constitution Week?

You voted:

Latest E-Edition

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.