Dear Editor, as a senior environmental scientist and environmental program manager for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board’s North Coast Region, I’ve spent more than a decade of my career studying, developing and implementing pollutant-control and ecological restoration programs for the Klamath River.

If you’ve ever visited the reservoirs behind the lower Klamath dams between the months of June and November, you know what that brings. Warm, nutrient-rich water is captured in deep pools, creating ideal conditions for the growth of Microcystis aeruginosa, a type of freshwater cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) that produces harmful algae blooms.

It produces a potent liver toxin (microcystin), and if you are in the water with Microcystis aeruginosa, it can cause skin rashes.

If people, pets or other animals ingest it, it can cause stomach cramps, nausea, diarrhea, and liver and kidney damage. High levels of microcystin have even caused deaths in pets, cattle and wildlife.

Trust me, you want to stay as far away from this stuff as possible.

In the reservoirs behind Copco 1, Copco 2, and Iron Gate dams, the concentrations of the toxic blue-green algae so often exceed levels considered safe that public health advisories are posted, and it is recommended that all contact with the water be avoided.

The toxin is so stable that even boiling water from the reservoirs does not destroy the microcystin or its toxic potential.

But here’s the interesting finding from our research. Many have long assumed that the toxic algae are imported into the reservoirs from Upper Klamath Lake. They believe that if we don’t do something about Upper Klamath Lake, the toxic algae will still persist downriver with or without the lower Klamath dams.

That is not true.

A recent study (Otten and Dreher 2017) showed that the toxic algae in Copco and Iron Gate is often a distinct population that is “homegrown” in the reservoirs, and is often genetically different from that found in Upper Klamath Lake.

In addition, Microcystis does not grow well in turbulent free-flowing rivers, so that even if toxic algae are transported into the river from upstream, the harmful algal blooms will not occur without the calm and warm water created behind the dams.

What these studies tell us is that removing the four lower Klamath dams and creating a free-flowing river would eliminate the ideal conditions that allow the Microcystis to grow to dangerous levels, and the public would no longer have to avoid the toxic waters for six months out of the year.

Clayton Creager


Stewardship Coordinator

California Regional

Water Quality Control

Board North

Coast Region


Online Poll

Are you ready for Spring?

You voted:

Latest E-Edition

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

1. Be Civil. No bullying, name calling, or insults.
2. Keep it Clean and Be Nice. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
3. Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
4. Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
5. Be Proactive. Let us know of abusive posts. Multiple reports will take a comment offline.
6. Stay On Topic. Any comment that is not related to the original post will be deleted.
7. Abuse of these rules will result in the thread being disabled, comments denied, and/or user blocked.